• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:35:32 +0100
• In-reply-to: <004401c2318b$98ba5a40$6500a8c0@seairthlaptop>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B6CA@HQ5> <200207221429.44577.miles@m...> <004401c2318b$98ba5a40$6500a8c0@seairthlaptop>

Seairth Jacobs wrote,
> > What? Even http://this.host.does.not.exist/ ?
> >
> > You won't even get a 404 from that. Do you count TCP-level failures
> > as "resolving"?
>
> Isn't this a bit outside of the bounds we are really talking about
> here?  It seems highly unlikely that someone is going to use a URL
> like that in any of their work because they are not the recognized
> authority of that URL.

OK, this.host.does.not.exist.milessabin.com will do just as well.

Cheers,


Miles

• References:
  • RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by Date: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread