• To: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Subject: RE: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 13:45:31 -0700
• Cc: "Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@f...>,"Garland foster" <garland_foster@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIwLePvSLcfevWkTWe/hqhPBLnF4wAAFVA+
• Thread-topic: Question for the XPath and DOM folks

-----Original Message----- 
From: J. David Eisenberg [mailto:catcode@c...] 
Sent: Sat 7/20/2002 1:41 PM 
To: Dare Obasanjo 
Cc: Uche Ogbuji; Garland foster; xml-dev@l... 
Subject: RE:  Question for the XPath and DOM folks

>>This is a bit unnerving - what else does msxml3 disagree with the others
>>on that could lead to a really big difference?

>As I see it, that's a much more important question to answer rather than
>whether it's a DOM node or who its parents and children are.

a.) This is not a more important question. 
 
b.) An explanation for this behavior has already been posted by Garland Foster. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Next by Date: Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Previous by thread: Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Next by thread: Re: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread