• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Trigram tables
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:22:43 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <200207151841.OAA23879@m...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>> lost is to the hishart commusted matimany he usider wit darly he the

>Well, I admit that this is not English, but neither is it anything else.
>It's fairly easy to spoof such tables if you are allowed to construct
>the text and it need not make sense.

It was constructed *from* your table, selecting possible trigrams with
probability proportional to their frequency.  Unfortunately you didn't
include the cross-word trigrams (s#a etc) which would probably have
made it better.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Trigram tables
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Trigram tables
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The general XML processing problem
• Next by Date: Re: The general XML processing problem
• Previous by thread: Re: Trigram tables
• Next by thread: RE: Trigram tables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread