• To: "Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@m...>,"Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:21:58 -0700
• Thread-index: AcIjhxL7aZMRxydGS8yBWAZscAlOKQCeHIr/ACj4NkA=
• Thread-topic: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery and DTD/Schema?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Denny-Brown 
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: Michael Fitzgerald; xml-dev@l...
> Subject:  RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] 
> XQuery and DTD/Schema?
> 
> Also note, that I am not even remotely defending WXS as a 
> complete, well-designed, nor elegant spec.  It just is, and 
> it achieves certain things which people wanted. 

For those out there that may not know what W3C XML Schema was supposed to achieve I suggest looking at the requirements from 1999[0] particularly the structures[1] and data types[2] sections

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req 
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req#Structural
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req#Datatype

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Lynch's Law: When the going gets tough, everyone leaves.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • RE: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery andDTD/Schema?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: schema tool
• Next by Date: Re: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery andDTD/Schema?
• Previous by thread: schema tool
• Next by thread: RE: RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery andDTD/Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread