• To: Robert Leftwich <robert@l...>
• Subject: Re: ANN: Building Web Services the REST Way
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 08:25:48 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020704181618.01b46158@192.168.0.5>

> To be more accurate I should have said 'REST did not come solely *after* 
> the fact as you appear to be implying'.
> I was responding to your assertion that the 'REST camp' is based on a 
> logical fallacy - 'Post hoc propter hoc' i.e. "after the fact, therefore 
> because of the fact".

Yes, that is exactly what I believe.

I look forward to someone with better memories (and mail archives:) 
proving me wrong.

	/r$

• References:
  • Re: ANN: Building Web Services the REST Way
    • From: Robert Leftwich <robert@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: toxins/tocsins (was RE: XQueryandDTD/Schema?)
• Next by Date: RE: toxins/tocsins (was RE: XQueryandDTD/Schema?)
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: Building Web Services the REST Way
• Next by thread: XML cross references and validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread