• To: "'Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer'" <schnitz@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: One XML doc - multiple Stylesheets
• From: "Jimmy Cerra" <jc2astro@h...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:29:42 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887465B4060@w...>
• Organization: University of Pittsburgh, CCAC
• Reply-to: <jc2astro@h...>

> James, I'm fully with you on that - CSS is great and does
> good stuff, while XSL, especially XSL-FO and how the
> xml stylesheet pi works is sort-of orthogonal in its behaviour.

Is the rule-based language, upon which CSS is based on, standardized?  If
not, then it should be (it can be an interesting complement to XML).

BTW, a really good article arguing against use of XSL-FO:
http://people.opera.com/howcome/1999/foch.html .

--
Jimmy Cerra
jfcst24@s...


============================================
"my mind is slipping away...
                   ...day by glorious day"
Robin Gorkin
============================================

• Follow-Ups:
  • Old tired article against XSL-FO is based on untenable premise
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • RE: One XML doc - multiple Stylesheets
    • From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The BBQ Proposition was Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Next by Date: RE: Data mining the semantic web? (was RE: Semantic Web)
• Previous by thread: RE: One XML doc - multiple Stylesheets
• Next by thread: Old tired article against XSL-FO is based on untenable premise
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread