• To: ricko@a... (Rick Jelliffe)
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 21:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., www-xml-blueberry-comments@w...
• In-reply-to: <007d01c23461$bd1afdd0$4bc8a8c0@A...> from "Rick Jelliffe" at Jul 26, 2002 03:03:10 PM

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> I do not believe that any of the three use cases provided by IBM justify changing the S
> production.  However, treating it as a newline/transcoding issue is appropriate.

Speaking for myself, I agree.

-- 
John Cowan   jcowan@r...   http://www.reutershealth.com
    "Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do
        will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
    "Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking
        you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by Date: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (long but worth it) :)
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread