• To: dhunter@v... (David Hunter)
• Subject: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... ('xml-dev@l... ')
• In-reply-to: <7AB2229D9557BF4AB41F2BB515D2C3DA37D9CB@torex2> from "David Hunter" at Jul 25, 2002 07:58:25 AM

David Hunter scripsit:

> So what are the other benefits of using URI for namespace names, that I'm
> missing?

Architectural conformance.  When you want to name something on the Web,
you use a URI; that's one of the things that makes the Web.

> Do people have these kinds of problems with Java package names?

Probably not.  Maybe there should be an URN type for them?
There is already one for SGML/XML public identifiers.

-- 
Not to perambulate              || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
    the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose      || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel

• References:
  • RE: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
    • From: David Hunter <dhunter@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML DOM Level 1 vs. DOM Level 2
• Next by Date: URI schemes (was Re: URIs harmful)
• Previous by thread: reversed referencing and dereferencing
• Next by thread: RE: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread