• To: =?utf-8?Q?Bill_de_h=C3=93ra?= <dehora@e...>,"David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>
• Subject: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 11:44:09 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIwGyi25LudO3nWTKOk8olDirdiVwAAhDTr
• Thread-topic: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:dehora@e...] 
Sent: Sat 7/20/2002 11:27 AM 
To: Dare Obasanjo; 'David Carlisle' 
Cc: xml-dev@l... 
Subject: RE:  Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning

>Dare, trying to get it right first time is waste of time. Is rough
>consensus and running code not good enough for ya?

You didn't get it. That's OK though since the W3C can do no wrong. :) 

• Prev by Date: Question for the XPath and DOM folks
• Next by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pacewith James Clark)
• Previous by thread: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Next by thread: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread