• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requirements?
• From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:04:16 +0100
• Cc: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621DAF@r...>
• Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621DAF@r...>
• Reply-to: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Dates are probably the only types requested with any sort of
> frequency to establish a trend. Funny enough, adding XSD dates may
> not satisfy some of our end users who expect to be able to use dates
> in the format from regular usage (e.g. MM-DD-YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY) and
> may balk at the ISO 8601 format used by XSD (YYYY-MM-DD)

There's the same problem with numbers, of course, or any data type
that has multiple possible (localised) lexical representations. In
EXSLT, we have date:parse-date() and date:format-date() to move from a
localised version to the ISO format (actually XML Schema format;
they're slightly different) and back again. I think that's a better
way to handle the problem than either forcing people to use a
particular representation in their data or accepting every possible
format they might use.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

• References:
  • RE: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requirements?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requirements?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requirements?
• Next by thread: Re: Is Anyone Interested In XPath 2.0 Use Cases or Requirements?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread