• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:22:30 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621E88@r...>

Dare claims:
> I've already pointed out that this isn't the only thing enabled by
> that aspect of the Namespaces in XML REC. 

Sorry Dare, but I'm still waiting for one use case where the pattern:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org"
about="http://www.w3.org/not/really/I'm/just/kidding/">

makes sense.  All I'm getting from you is noise about global attributes,
which my proposal doesn't affect _in the slightest_, and talk about OOP
best practice.

I'm listening, but I'm not hearing anything.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: RE: External parsed general entities
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread