• To: drudder@d... (Doug Rudder)
• Subject: Re: URI indigestion
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:22:24 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: danny666@v... ('Danny Ayers'), mc@x... (Mike Champion), xml-dev@l... (Xml-Dev)
• In-reply-to: <7FEEE73A06F3D411A99D00508BD634100104E500@FACEXCH1> from "Doug Rudder" at Jul 25, 2002 02:13:06 PM

Doug Rudder scripsit:

> Question:  How much impact would a solution such as the one proposed by
> Seairth Jacobs have?  That is, the "Scheme-Independent Universal Resource
> Identifier (SI-URI)" concept which drops the scheme from the URI
> ("//seairth.com/AbstractResource").

That already means something: it is an URL relative to the current scheme.
Such things are deprecated, but they do exist.

Instead, use an URN like urn:publicid:seairth.com:AbstractResource.
This is not the image of an FPI, but is still valid.  If you wanted
to make it an FPI, it would be (IIRC)
urn:publicid:IDN+seairth.com+NONSGML+AbstractResource:EN .

-- 
John Cowan   jcowan@r...   http://www.reutershealth.com
    "Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do
        will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
    "Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking
        you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."

• Follow-Ups:
  • SI-URIs (was Re: URI indigestion)
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
  • RE: URI indigestion
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• References:
  • RE: URI indigestion
    • From: Doug Rudder <drudder@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: URI indigestion
• Next by Date: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Previous by thread: RE: URI indigestion
• Next by thread: RE: URI indigestion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread