Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> From: Andrew Dubinsky [mailto:andy@e...] > A fully resolved link would include the data within the same file > resource. E.g. a copy of the resource. > > <img src="<<binhex data of gif>>" /> Sorry Andrew, that doesn't seem right at all. Even if it did, it won't be usable. > > I understand that copying the gif data within each file is fat and > 'violates' the spirit of the URI concept. Yes you can say that again :-) > However, in our use, we must > have the data bound directly to a digitally signed file. In the normal > use of links, the underlying content of the link could be changed > without modifying the hashed value of the document. How about bundling the files (html, images and the like) to an executable? > Any usages of legal documents pointing to user agreements, or other > click-through agreements fall within the category. E.g. Which > agreement > did you agree to if it was included by reference (and not by direct > inclusion) if the agreement is no longer available? Perhaps you need to use SVG instead of HTML. > In other words, no standard parser would understand it. Yup. Manos
|
