• To: "'Rob Lugt'" <roblugt@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation?
• From: MAISONNY Benoit <Benoit.MAISONNY@e...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:28:41 +0200

Hmmm... You are right.
For some reason, I had 2 versions of xhtml-special.ent in separate
directories and I checked the wrong one. I'll get rid of the bogus one,
promised! :-)

Sorry about this.

Benoit


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Lugt [mailto:roblugt@e...]
> Sent: 30 June 2002 23:25
> To: Benoit.MAISONNY@e...; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? 
> 
> 
> Benoit Maisonny wrote:
> 
> >I did further tests with the "bogus" DTD and the other 
> parsers. I think it
> >can be interesting to report that here. I simply added 
> "<" somewhere in
> >my sample XML instance and tried to validate it. Results:
> 
> > ElCel's xmlvalid 0.14.7 doesn't and reports:
> > xhtml-special.ent [37:20] : Fatal error: entity reference
> > must start with a letter, '_' or ':'
> >  Note that the lt entity is in fact on line 35, not 37.
> 
> Hi Benoit,
> 
> I found your assertion that xmlvalid was getting the line number wrong
> alarming, so I down-loaded the xhtml modularization files to 
> take a look.
> I'm not sure why you think that the "lt" entity is on line 
> 35, because in
> the copy I downloaded [1] it does indeed appear on line 37.
> 
> Regards
> ~Rob
> 
> --
> Rob Lugt
> ElCel Technology
> http://www.elcel.com/
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/xhtml-modularization.zip
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
• Next by thread: Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread