• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (long but worth it) :)
• From: Daniel Dui <d.dui@c...>
• Date: 31 Jul 2002 15:08:59 +0100
• In-reply-to: <3D446D85.30101@t...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621E4C@r.... com> <3D446D85.30101@t...>

On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 23:17, Tim Bray wrote:
> ... one of the virtues of descriptive markup a la XML is that you 
> get to choose what semantics you want to apply. 

???

That would mean that...

<moneyTransfer>
  <amount>$1,000,000</amount>
  <account>daniel_account_number</account>
  <account>tim_account_number</account>
</moneyTransfer>

which means "transfer $1,000,000 from daniel_account_number to
tim_account_number", but I can chose to apply the semantics: "transfer
$1,000,000 from tim_account_number to daniel_account_number"

-daniel


-- 
______________________________________________________________________
  Daniel Dui                                     d.dui@c...
  Dept. of Computer Science                     (+44) 020 7679 7192
  University College London     http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/d.dui

• References:
  • Re: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (longbut worth it) :)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Partitioning?
• Next by Date: RE: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (long but worth it) :)
• Previous by thread: Re: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (longbut worth it) :)
• Next by thread: Re: On Schemas, Namespaces and Syntax vs. Semantics (long but worth it) :)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread