• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: The version number in XML documents
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 08:41:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... ('John Cowan'), xml-dev@l..., xml-editor@w...
• In-reply-to: <002b01c2315f$29f918c0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> from "Michael Kay" at Jul 22, 2002 10:07:11 AM

Michael Kay scripsit:

> The process should not be used in a way that makes parsers that are
> unambiguously conformant with the original specification suddenly become
> non-conformant, and that forces new releases of those parsers to reject
> documents that they previously accepted. 

Well, does anyone know of documents that actually do this, or parsers
that actually accept such hypothetical documents?

-- 
Not to perambulate              || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
    the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose      || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel

• References:
  • RE: The version number in XML documents
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: Re: XML Infosets and SOAP 1.2
• Previous by thread: RE: The version number in XML documents
• Next by thread: Re: The version number in XML documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread