• To: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Subject: Re: The general XML processing problem
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 16 Jul 2002 13:32:40 +0200
• Cc: bill.dehora@p..., 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3D33F900.2000002@e...>
• References: <001501c22caf$6ac1f430$1fc8c8c8@mitchum> <3D33F900.2000002@e...>

Hi Patrick,

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 12:44, Patrick Durusau wrote:

> Would not necessarily even require context-free parsers. Imagine (you 
> can do this with SAX) that you specify rules that consume markup by 
> namespaces (well, at least namespaces as in classic concur). Certainly 
> could validate an XML document that is not "well-formed" through the 
> various namespaces.

Yes, your presentation at XML Europe 2002 made it perfectly clear that
it is not *that* natural to build namespaces on top of "tree markup" but
might be as natural (and as usefull too) to build "tree markup" of top
of namespaces and I must say I had never had such a clear perception of
this issue before.

Thanks for opening my eyes :-)

Eric
-- 
See you in San Diego.
                               http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: The general XML processing problem
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: The general XML processing problem
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The general XML processing problem
• Next by Date: Re - Outcome processing in IMS
• Previous by thread: Re: The general XML processing problem
• Next by thread: RE: The general XML processing problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread