Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 05:02 PM 7/3/2002 +0100, Michael Kay wrote: >Can you provide evidence for this? Just conversations at conferences with editors of various specifications. I fear I don't normally carry a tape recorder. >I've done a search on the archives >(it would have been easier if relax were not a normal English verb) and >I can't find any. There are a number of individual messages that mention >RELAX in passing, e.g. to illustrate alternative type semantics; but no >minutes that indicate that RELAX has ever been discussed or "brushed >aside". I think there may be a difference between "being aware of something and discussing it privately" and "formally introducing it into the working group as an issue". > > at one point I > > understood the formal model had much more in common with > > RELAX NG than with W3C XML Schema. > >That might well be true. Integration with Schema has certainly been at >times a painful process: I never suggested otherwise. I find it remarkable how many masochists appear to be on that committee. I don't know how else to explain such a strange phenomenon. Simon St.Laurent "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
