• To: "Jason Diamond" <jason@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 11:29:46 -0700
• Thread-index: AcIaF8Lx/0Qdu1N7RR+b9WclKqwDaQAAZ0iw
• Thread-topic: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Diamond [mailto:jason@i...] 
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 11:08 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
> 
> For most projects, I would wager that complex types are 
> almost exclusively derived be extension since that's 
> typically how we derive classes in our object-oriented 
> programming languages, wouldn't you agree? 

You are probably right since most of the schemas I see in our XML
newsgroups that use restriction are restricting simple types not complex
types. 

> Especially when 
> we're talking about the complex types generated from C# (or 
> Java) classes for WSDL documents.

I wasn't. 


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
No one wants constructive criticism. It's all we can do to put up with
constructive praise.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread