• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:20:25 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <002001c21153$d39cc6a0$2001a8c0@bryans> <3D0631B5.1030703@r...> <015a01c21175$f8763f20$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

Hi Rick,

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>So publishing people don't really have data that needs to be validated?  
>With that kind of thinking, you should join the Schema WG :-)
>
Ouch! And have to join people like R.Jelliffe? I have no problem 
admitting that XML Schema is horribly complex, and may not meet the 
needs of the document publishing community very well. But it does meet 
many needs, including mine, and I'd be daft to say otherwise :-).

Francis.

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread