• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:47:34 -0600
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020611143101.01e08438@p...>
• References: <015a01c21175$f8763f20$4bc8a8c0@A...> <002001c21153$d39cc6a0$2001a8c0@bryans> <3D0631B5.1030703@r...> <015a01c21175$f8763f20$4bc8a8c0@A...> <4.2.0.58.20020611143101.01e08438@p...>
• Reply-to: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:35:12PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 12:26 PM 6/11/2002 -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
> >Maybe publishing people can
> >use DTDs, RELAX NG, or Schematron, and let the Web Services crowd have
> >their bloated XSD. As long as they don't force everyone to use it.
> 
> I don't think "as long as they don't force everyone to use it" is nearly 
> adequate here.
> 
> There's a fundamental naming problem with XSD - it's called "XML Schema", 
> it's published by the W3C, and it's frequently described as a core part of 
> "XML".

I consider that a subtle means of forcing everyone to use it. And
endorse the movement against that practice.

-- 
Matt Gushee
Englewood, Colorado, USA
mgushee@h...
http://www.havenrock.com/

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread