• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:43:08 -0700
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CB2@r...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> The fact that a number of W3C Working Groups make a political 
 > decision to create interdependencies amongst W3C recommendations
 > (some of them even circular) does not say anything about the technical
 > merits of W3C XML Schema. It is indeed an indictment of the W3C
 > process and their idea of "layered specs"

I have argued often that some of the specs are too big and too 
complicated and don't hit 80/20 points.  But it's hard to see how you 
could possibly get away from layering specs.  You can't write everything 
into One Big Standard, and you need to pull together different pools of 
expertise.  Or do you see another way to do things? -Tim

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread