• To: "'Hutchison, Nigel'" <Nigel.Hutchison@s...>
• Subject: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:34:24 -0500
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

Umm... not exactly.  You can choose to 
process it as a sign (no need to dereference) 
or to process it as a symbol because of the 
record of authority.   Yes, that is a good 
thing because it is your choice.  In other 
words, the choice to exercise a processing 
asset is local.  You choose what "correct 
processing" means and you get to make that 
choice once or every time you use that process.

len

From: Hutchison, Nigel [mailto:Nigel.Hutchison@s...]

Actually I think this a good thing.
It means my application can process my RDF correctly even if I am not
connected to the rest of the planet.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schema considered harmful?
• Previous by thread: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Next by thread: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread