Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:54 PM > To: Dare Obasanjo > Cc: John Cowan; Rick Taylor; xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt <snip mimicing W3C XML Schem extension> > Does that replicate the functionality sufficiently? Of > course the definitions can be in separate schema files. Type derivation in XSD comes in two flavors; extension and restriction. Extension is easy to mimic even with DTDs. However how does RELAX NG mimic restrictions (especially the nested ones) that involve facets like xs:minInclusive, xs:maxInclusive? > > A lot of functionality falls under extensible types including > > polymorphism via substitution groups and xsi:type which I > do not see <snip choice> > Wherever h is referenced, an h1 or h2 or ... element may > appear. There is no constraint that they have compatible > content models, though. Without the constraint that they have compatible content models then it is just an xs:choice > > Is there anything akin to xs:redefine in RELAX NG? I > couldn't find it in > > a cursory reading of the tutorial or the spec. > > Yes. If you say: > > include "subspec" { > foo = ... > bar = ... > baz = ... > } Interesting. Could you point me at the part of the spec or tutorial that discusses this functionality. Thanks. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Any philosophy that can be put into a nutshell belongs there. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
