• To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• Subject: Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:49:06 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCCEGGEMAA.julian.reschke@g...>; from julian.reschke@g... on Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 08:48:11AM +0200
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CF8@r...> <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCCEGGEMAA.julian.reschke@g...>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Not so. The reason WebDAV "gets away" with the badly chosen namespace name is the fact that RFC2396+ is going to allow empty scheme-specific parts, making "just the scheme name" a valid URI. At least that's my understanding of the outcome of the discussion.

"RFC 2396+" is likely going to allow empty scheme-specific parts
*because* WebDAV made a boo-boo, not the other way around. 8-)

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@a...
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Best Practice - beyond schema
• Next by Date: RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
• Previous by thread: RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
• Next by thread: RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread