• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: Nigel.Hutchison@s... ('Hutchison Nigel'), costello@m... ('Roger L. Costello'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B52A@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Jun 05, 2002 10:08:47 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Are they in the semiotic sense, arbitrary signs (chosen 
> by convention, and not inherently meaningful)?  

Yes, except that Source of Authority information is embedded in them.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Next by Date: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Previous by thread: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Next by thread: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread