• To: "'Roger L. Costello'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:47:48 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3CFD4BD3.AC317AAA@m...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger L. Costello [mailto:costello@m...] 
>
> With RDDL a namespace may be used as a URL to a RDDL document.


> With RDF a property's namespace must point to an RDF Schema
> document.  

I'll stick my neck out an say this is not true. I checked the april
22 edition of RDFS <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/> and didn't
find that specification. The RDF MT defines an RDFS vocabulary as a
set of URI refs and doesn't say anything about RDFS documents.

[Not unrelated: an RDF property doesn't have a namespace but it
does have a name, which is a URI reference. If an RDF property is
placed in an XML namespace for serialization that's merely an
implementation detail of the XML serialization. RDF is not an XML
grammar.]


> So, can RDDL and RDF coexist?  

There's no problem coexisting. 

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPP1RoOaWiFwg2CH4EQIHsgCfTaoKzoKIBZ4P/2pqKke54eVoUC0AoKqN
flEnVlxPDQU9qZSt/F4K6PUC
=ZWv8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• References:
  • Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside
• Next by Date: RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside
• Previous by thread: Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Next by thread: Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread