• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 11:31:19 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020629160451.00ad4a40@m...>

At 04:08 PM 6/29/2002 +0100, Sean McGrath wrote:
>"W3C Schema will soon disappear into oblivion without a non XML syntax..."
>
>- Tom Gaven, XML Journal. Vol 3, Issue 6, Page 48
>
>Opinions?

I thought the same of XSLT, and here I am on a Saturday morning working 
with XSLT.

I think RELAX NG's non-XML syntax works because the model in RELAX NG works 
pretty simply.  I have a very very hard time picturing a non-XML syntax for 
W3C XML Schema, and I'm not sure that it would be any more readable or 
workable than the XML syntax.

I'd love to be proven wrong on that one.

Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@e...>
  • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS
    • From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>

• References:
  • Non-xml syntax for WXS
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• Next by Date: RE: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• Previous by thread: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• Next by thread: Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread