• To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Subject: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:41:15 -0700
• Cc: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D138067.CB5F0AC5@m...>

Why use RELAX NG over XML Schema? Well, here's the test: Just use RELAX NG.

Yes, I know, circumstances force us all to work outside of our convictions,
and so I use XML Schema as well as RELAX NG. But I have yet to find someone,
anyone, who has used BOTH XML Schema AND RELAX NG regularly or extensively
and has not come to prefer RELAX NG. If anyone has found otherwise, do tell.

Mike

Roger Costello wrote:
> And what percentage of people use RNG vs XML Schemas?  I think that it's
> pretty safe to say that the percentage is overwhelmingly in favor of XML
> Schemas.  Consequently, if I used RNG it would in the huge majority of
> cases need to be converted to an XML Schema.  Is RNG a good starting
> point for generating XML Schemas?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread