• To: tbray@t... (Tim Bray)
• Subject: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3D16463F.4010407@t...> from "Tim Bray" at Jun 23, 2002 03:05:51 PM

Tim Bray scripsit:

> Well, I routinely use perl regexps to process great big XML instances, 
> when those instances have been generated by machine.  There is no good 
> reason at this point to introduce more complexity to XML parsing. -Tim

And (as old-timers know)  I routinely route XML documents by using fgrep,
without ever parsing them at all.

Just another desperate fgrep hacker,

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
• Next by thread: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread