Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
[ I dropped dsdl-comment@d... as apparently its moderated and I'm not on it] > which claim, as I noted, is bogus. It's not particularly useful but I don't see how you can argue with the spec. If it says that elements are in no namespace unless explictly declared to be in a namespace then presumably that is the case, by definition. (Even if the only sensible way to interpret these things is to treat them as if they were in a namespace with either no name or name ""). > So what does one call this 'set of names which has the name "", but > which one can for historical reasons not call a namespace'? That. (phrases like that appear most weeks on xsl-list in answer to user questions:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
