• To: aray@n... (Arjun Ray)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <heriguoqf4tp1g82gnj4ec6gkpambflmql@4...> from "Arjun Ray" at Jun 14, 2002 04:23:58 AM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> Actually, it isn't.  There is no requirement (AFAIK) that the ArchUse PI
> appear within the subsets of a document type declaration - it can be a
> free standing PI in the document instance (ie another part of the =
> prolog.)

Sorry, I meant that it's inside the *instance*.  Never mind.


-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread