• To: 'Bill de hÓra' <dehora@e...>,"'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@m...>,"'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:10:59 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <000201c210a3$0bf08160$887ba8c0@mitchum>

> > If you're implying that individual organizations are playing
> > politics, then of course I buy that but I find it hard to
> > believe that representatives from individual organizations
> > would have the skill to manipulate so many others.
> 
> It's not that. Complexity naturally resists commodization. The
> interdependencies make it hard for those with less resources to
> write the code. In particular XML Schema processing is no joke to
> implement...
> 
> Bill de hÓra

Agreed. Building distributed systems is not for the faint of heart. In
the Web service space, we don't need the ad-hoc implementations you're
alluding to. All major vendors that most distributed application
developers care about have already stepped up to the plate.

-aaron
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Fredrik Lindgren <fredrik.lindgren@c...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread