Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
schematron uses a different paradigm from RELAX NG and XML-Schema. however, schematron uses this paradigm for somewhat the same purpose as what RELAX NG and XML-Schema do. but I think there recently have been efforts that schematron actually complements what is done by RELAX NG and XML-Schema -- that is very good. I have not followed schematron closely but I think what is really interesting contribution from schematron is the paradigm by which it does things -- the applications where it is useful, I am not sure. Again, if someone could provide some application scenarios and how schematron helps with some technical detail, I would be very glad. thanks and regards - murali. On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Someone usually does. The SGMLers understand it and practiced it > virtually like a religion (the SGML Way). It gets messy however to > ignore processing contexts if systems are to interoperate without > human interventions. A reason for understanding what features XML > Schema, RELAX NG and/or Schematron enable is to pick the right tool to > get the right strength of agreement. (Am I the only one who considers > Schematron almost heroic? It is the one piece the others need > consistently and why I am holding out for DSDL.)
|
