• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:51:31 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D083CDD.AE9C8417@r...>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006

On 6/13/02 2:34 AM, "Ronald Bourret" <rpbourret@r...> wrote:

> Norman Walsh wrote:
>> 
>> / John Cowan <jcowan@r...> was heard to say:
>> | Issue: Is it an error to mention a prefix that is not declared?  My
>> | answer: no; if this is done, name matching falls back to string identity.
>> 
>> If the DTD contains an <!NAMESPACE decl, yes, otherwise no.
> 
> Also agreed. Don't allow a halfway solution -- you're either using
> namespaces or you're not.
> 

I'm not sure what you mean by this. That this is to be the only way to
declare namespaces? That you can't mix DTD and old-style namespace
declarations/specification (whatever)?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by Date: Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread