• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Data binding as type definition
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:32:05 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020611153131.0215bcb0@p...>
• Organization: DevelopMentor
• Reply-to: <aarons@d...>

> At 01:26 PM 6/11/2002 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> >I agree with John that a type is a named value-space. I also 
> >agree with Simon that for type to be useful in XML, its 
> >value-space must correspond to a well-defined lexical-space. 
> >This is exactly what XML Schema provides.

> Simon St.Laurent:
> It provides it through a very limited set of transformations 
> from lexical to value which have their own peculiarities, and 
> blesses the value space almost exclusively.

Can you expand on this?
 
> This is inadequate for those of us who care about lexical 
> flexibility, and your supposed agreement is effectively strong 
> disagreement.

Man, you're so literal ;-) I thought we actually agreed on 
something this time.

-aaron
http://staff.develop.com/aarons

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Data binding as type definition
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Data binding as type definition
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
• Next by Date: RE: Data binding as type definition
• Previous by thread: RE: Data binding as type definition
• Next by thread: RE: Data binding as type definition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread