Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 03:12 PM 6/7/2002 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >RELAX NG is constitutionally incapable of providing reliable >type assertions. Constitutionally incapable? While I understand that RELAX NG _can_ support non-deterministic/unreliable models, I don't believe that makes it incapable of supporting reliable type assertions provided that the writers of the schema consider that a goal. I've argued for a long while that type information should be 'painted' as a separate process from validation. Compared to that approach, I can't say I find W3C XML Schema particularly reliable as a source of type assertions. Simon St.Laurent "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
