• To: jgreif@a... (Jeff Greif)
• Subject: Re: Namespace problem
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <00b001c20ca9$dcce0210$6400a8c0@JMG> from "Jeff Greif" at Jun 05, 2002 08:58:41 AM

Jeff Greif scripsit:

> Unless you wish to apply different constraints or content models to
> .../Customer/Name and .../Product/Name, it's OK to let them be duplicate
> element names and distinguish them using their context (retrieval by XPath,
> etc.).

And of course if you use RELAX NG, you can give them different content
models; if you use Schematron, you can give them different constraints.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Namespace problem
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schema considered harmful?
• Next by Date: RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace problem
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread