[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> As Clark's message is being passed along working 
> groups like a grassfire, the assertions that XML Schema is 
> hard, incomplete, inadequate, somehow not right, are being 
> accepted uncritically in many venues based on the source.
> 
> That is not a good thing.

On the contrary, it's an unalloyed good thing.  We have moved from a 
situation in which nobody in the world had ever heard of any schema 
facility other than XSD to a situation in which we are having widespread 
and quite enlightening discussions about pros and cons and trade-offs 
and options.  This is a major win.

And yes, it needed a fairly large-caliber cannon blast to alert the 
world that there are some issues here.   Sometimes you have to dump tea 
in the harbor to launch a debate about taxation structure.  -Tim


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member