• To: aray@n... (Arjun Ray)
• Subject: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <fu7sgu423350pfck3r2ai5j3fvfe7fppj2@4...> from "Arjun Ray" at Jun 17, 2002 05:50:08 PM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> | IMO, the non XML format is only a pain for a parser writer. 
> 
> And an XML format would be a pain for the human reader/maintainer.

Wherefore RNG has both, with interchange between either of them and
DTD syntax.  (There's a hole in James's programs right now whereby
they can't output the non-XML syntax, but that's fixable: there isn't
anything in principle preventing one from doing so.)

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Best Practice - beyond schema
• Next by Date: RE: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Previous by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: RE: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread