• To: "'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:41:55 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D074116.31E5944A@f...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: W. E. Perry [mailto:wperry@f...] 
>

Walter,

> I apologize if this seems like nitpicking or if my point 
> appears nearly invisible. It is not. 

I intuit you do have a point. It's hard to follow. I suspect
there's a good amount of terminology that you're using. Perhaps you
could write it up in a more accessible form, for those of who are
not familiar with philology, but are interested in the relationship
between XML data and processing over that data?

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPQddsOaWiFwg2CH4EQI7PQCgsPlAYpgkU7pRQV6XT+oDhRLkUREAnAkl
3xRvvXdMjEjiORItmlTumeGN
=LiaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread