• To: 'Bill de hOra' <dehora@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:35:41 -0500

All very cool stuff.  It is just that the tools 
and uses vary by locale.  With all these options, 
we can't count on anything but to locale to locale 
relationships.  And that is, IMO, the way it should 
be.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill de hOra [mailto:dehora@e...]

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
>
> Global exchange with blind partners is risky. 
> It depends on what the TAG quaintly calls 
> "social behaviour" and in a world of intensely 
> competitive social entities, that is not a 
> smart way to contract or design.

I should add that the OMG's MDA seems to be posed as something to model
the integrations/orchestrations amongst systems, rather than|as well as,
technology to design applications (which would have been standard use of
UML in the past). I think Uche did a presentation on MDA and RDF at
Barcelona.

• Prev by Date: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• Next by Date: Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema)
• Previous by thread: Re: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
• Next by thread: Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread