• To: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 22:28:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), dsdl-comment@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <86ptyxb9kz.fsf@p...> from "K. Ari Krupnikov" at Jun 11, 2002 08:54:20 PM

K. Ari Krupnikov scripsit:

> Another feature I'd like to see reintroduced is comments inside markup
> declarations, they make DTDs so much more readable:
> 
> <!ATTLIST foo    bar    CDATA   #REQUIRED  -- comment for bar --
>                  baz    ID      #IMPLIED   -- comment for baz -->

I agree.  Ken, can we add this one to the use cases/requirements?

10) Comments inside declarations.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread