[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Wow! What politics would be of interest to the WG entity consisting of representatives from numerous competing organizations? If you're implying that individual organizations are playing politics, then of course I buy that but I find it hard to believe that representatives from individual organizations would have the skill to manipulate so many others. -aaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...] > > The fact that a number of W3C Working Groups make a political decision to > create interdependencies amongst W3C recommendations (some of them even > circular) does not say anything about the technical merits of W3C XML > Schema. It is indeed an indictment of the W3C process and their idea of > "layered specs" > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@d...] > > > To the extent that that is the case, to say "XSD is here to stay" > > a statement of branding and power rather than anything concerning > > technical merits or compatability. > > The fact that the W3C has assumed XML Schema in layered specs like > XPath > 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XML Query (the original argument) says a lot about > the technical merits considering the W3C process. > > -aaron
|

Cart



