• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: xsi:type and broken contracts
• From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>
• Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 00:09:10 +1000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CA1@r...>

> The code doesn't have to be part of a library, it could just be 
> code that manipulates documents coming in from external sources. 
> The fact is that the combination of xsi:schemaLocation and 
> xsi:type make it very likely that a type aware application will 
> come across derived types in instance documents unless these 
> attributes are specifically mandated against. 

Understood. I had neglected to factor in the effect of schemaLocation
attributes.

So depending on the service offered, it may be useful 
to programatically ignore "helpful" schemaLocation hints and rely
solely on a local cache. Section 4.3.2 of
the XML Schema Part 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#schema-loc
leaves the door open for products to allow this.

Thanks for your patience.
Michael.

• References:
  • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
• Next by Date: RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside
• Previous by thread: RE: xsi:type and broken contracts
• Next by thread: RE: xsi:type and broken contracts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread