• To: 'Bill de hÓra' <dehora@e...>,"'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:35:16 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <001601c21145$2b4b5c90$887ba8c0@mitchum>
• Organization: DevelopMentor
• Reply-to: <aarons@d...>

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@d...] 
> >
> > Not a stairway to heaven but hopefully interoperability 
> > between services. Achieving interop between distributed 
> > services is inherently more complex than functionality 
> > provided by the Web up to this point. 
> 
> Interesting claim. Where is that inherent complexity coming from?
> 
> Bill de hÓra

For starters, I think we've been doing a good job recently hashing out
the complexities that arise when not everyone agrees on a type system.
:-) 

It wasn't such a requirement with humans involved in Web applications.

-aaron
http://staff.develop.com/aarons

• References:
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Data binding as type definition
• Next by Date: Re: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance isFutile, says Don Box)
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread