Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
agreed Rob Lugt ElCel Technology ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM" <keshlam@u...> To: <xerces-j-dev@x...> Cc: "<sax-devel" <sax-devel@l...>; "Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo" <elharo@m...>; "<xerces-j-dev" <xerces-j-dev@x...>; "<xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM Subject: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements > > It's been pointed out that my last note was some what garbled, due to an > editing goof (sorry!) -- let me try again, rephrasing the whole thing: > > Do we have consensus that when namespace processing is turned on, a > non-qualified element or attribute has the same value for both QName and > Local Name? > > If so: we've resolved the subject question; move to close debate. > > If not: Could someone indicate where the remaining confusion lies? (I know > I could benefit from some re-focusing of the question; I suspect that might > help others as well.) > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > List: sax-devel, sax-devel@l... > See: http://www.saxproject.org/ > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel > >
|
