Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Simon St.Laurent wrote > >Sure, I was thinking of adding these extensions (perhaps they should be > >called contractions) as an option to ElCel's xmlcanon [1]. Would anybody > >find this useful? > > As long as it's a separate part and not built right into the parser, it > sounds good to me. That would only be possible if the suggested changes were handled by some kind of pre-processor. I don't think such a pre-processor would be viable; it would need to have all the features of an XML parser itself. However, I don't see updating the XML parser as being a problem, so long as the extensions are controlled by options which are disabled by default. Regards ~Rob
|
