Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Anderson, John" <John@B...> writes:
> Unfortunately, this mechanism below would not seem to remove mainteneance of
> multiple schemas. If you use restriction, any change to the global type will
> (potentially) require all the redefines also to be modified (or at least,
> checked for consistency).
TANSTAAFL -- the whole _point_ of using derivation is so that changes
to the base carry through to the derived types -- if they make changes
to a changed part, then they have to change too -- how else could it
be?
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
