• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:26:01 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D06179E.D5FB3B79@p...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
>
> Bill de hÓra wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@d...]
> > >
> > > Not a stairway to heaven but hopefully interoperability
> > > between  services. Achieving interop between distributed
> > > services is  inherently more complex than functionality
> > > provided by 
> the Web up to 
> > > this point.
> > 
> > Interesting claim. Where is that inherent complexity coming
> > from? 
> 
> Latency and unreliability. i.e. physics.

Cool, I didn't know the web had workarounds for physical
limitations. Read the post Paul :(  There's a claim up there to the
effect that there is something inherently complex about distributed
systems that the web can't provide for; I'm asking to know where
that complexity is coming from (or even what it is).

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPQYkl+aWiFwg2CH4EQLtoACg2BB1YzFaHD3lQ5/w+RomSSAiL9gAoOOr
sNti0C8sd+qjshfAG9cpIeqv
=N42M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Data binding as type definition
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread